Skip to content

Teaching Guide

Phone Restrictions and Digital Wellness in Schools

Teaching Guide Overview

This teaching guide is designed to support kindergarten through grade 12 (K–12) educators across Canada with classroom activities and lesson plans designed to engage students on personal phone and device restrictions in schools. It encourages broader reflection on technology use and digital wellness.

The guide contains two parts:

  • Part 1 provides essential context for teachers about the “Heads Up” initiative, the evidence-based rationale for personal device restrictions, and alignment to provincial curricula.
  • Part 2 provides a menu of adaptable instructional activities categorized by relevant grade bands.

The guide is informed by the Dais’ “phone-free schools” mobilization across Canada. It is designed to align with curricula in all 10 provinces, including Literacy/English/French, Digital Literacy, and Health.

part 1:Context

Background: The Dais’ “Heads Up” initiative

Launched in 2024 by the Dais at Toronto Metropolitan University, Heads Up is a Canada-wide campaign to reclaim focus, learning and real connection by going “phone free” at school, from bell to bell. It is centred on the belief that, with less distraction, students are free to think, join in, work together, and thrive.

Heads Up is tackling this urgent challenge by:

  • Mobilizing for phone-free classrooms, supporting parents, educators, school boards, and governments with information, policy guidance, training, and impact tracking on phone restrictions in K–12 classrooms across Canada.
  • Leading a Youth Champions Program, equipping high school students in every province to engage their peers and advocate for positive change around school phone policies and build healthier digital habits.

Why schools are restricting phones and personal devices

There has been a growing movement in Canada and internationally to reduce the use of phones and personal digital devices in classrooms, as evidence grows about the harms of excessive use. Phones, tablets, and similar electronic devices can be valuable learning tools, but their use has resulted in harmful distractions that negatively impact student well-being and success.

All provincial governments have introduced some form of restriction on students’ use of phones and personal digital devices at school, tasking school boards, school leaders and educators with carrying them out. Common rationales for these policies include:

  • Improving classroom engagement: International evidence confirms that phones can be a major source of distraction that interrupts learning, reduces attention spans, and fragments the classroom environment.
  • Repairing school culture: Research suggests that activities like cyberbullying spill over into school hours, corroding school culture.
  • Improving mental health: Excessive phone use has been linked to adverse psychological effects, such as depression and disrupted social development among children and adolescents.
  • Encouraging physical activity: Evidence shows that screen-based sedentary behaviours (such as reduced physical activity, sitting for long periods) are associated with reduced sleep duration and quality, and may also contribute to long-term health risks.
  • Combatting internet addiction: About two-fifths of Canadians aged 15 to 24 (42 per cent) reported spending 20 hours or more per week on general internet use in 2022, the highest among all age groups.

These findings inform four companion tools that this guide references:

  • Policy Comparison Map: an interactive, province-by-province snapshot of the rules in place.
  • Policymaker Playbook: guidance for policymakers to refine and implement balanced phone restriction policies.
  • Implementation Guide: a practical resource for school leaders, principals, and educators with clear steps, routines, and ready-to-use tools to implement full-day phone-free policies.
  • Roundtable Reflections: key themes and takeaways from cross-provincial discussions hosted by the Dais to better understand opportunities and challenges of early implementation of phone restrictions in schools.

Objectives and Curriculum Alignment

This teaching guide offers activities that reflect provincial curriculum expectations and learning outcomes. It is guided by a belief that phone restrictions are more effective and sustainable where they are clearly explained, consistently applied, and have student buy-in and input.

Each activity aims to encourage understanding, inquiry, and personal reflection about the rationale for, and application of, school phone policies, as well as broader intersecting digital wellness issues. The activities further aim to equip students to build habits for critical thinking and digital well-being, generally aligned to two curriculum subject areas that are common across all 10 provinces:

  • Health curriculum, with the objective to engage with social deprivation, mental health, youth development, classroom performance, digital footprint management, and building healthy digital habits as they relate to school device restrictions.
  • Literacy/English/French curriculum, with the objectives to understand the importance of media consumption and of acquiring information from a variety of sources; furthermore, to develop the critical skills needed to evaluate, authenticate, and critique information encountered online.

The following table outlines the common expectations for each, linking to the relevant curriculum documents for each province.

Common expectationSubjectProvinces
I can reflect on personal digital habits, and examine the short- and long-term impact of digital habit choices, and its relationship on health and well-being.HealthBC, MB, NB, NS 
I can identify healthy digital habits, and identify strategies to balance the use of technology with other goals.HealthAB, BC, NB, NS, ON, PEI, QC
I can identify the effects of excessive use of multimedia technology, and demonstrate a practical incorporation of healthy digital habits and routines.HealthMB, NB, NS, ON, PEI, QC 
I can identify the intentions, intended audience, and potential impacts of mis/disinformation in examples provided in the activities.Literacy/English/FrenchAB, BC, MB, NB, NFL, NS*, ON, PEI, QC, SK
FR** (QC, NB, ON)
I can list a few clear differences between similar/related messages portrayed through different types of media. I can explain how these differences would be impactful to different audiences.Literacy/English/FrenchAB, BC, MB, NFL, NS, ON, PEI, QC, SK
FR** (QC, NB, ON)
I can identify the advantages and disadvantages between types of media, and how the type of media can influence the way I perceive a message.Literacy/English/FrenchAB, BC, MB, NFL, NS, ON, PEI, QC, SK
FR** (QC, NB, ON)
I can identify different types of media, explain what bias is, and determine different approaches social media content creators use to appeal to emotions.Literacy/English/French/Culture and CitizenshipAB, BC, MB, NB, NFL, NS, ON, PEI, QC, SK
FR** (QC (Culture and Citizenship), NB, ON)
I can make presentations in a variety of forms for various purposes and audiences.Literacy/English/FrenchAB, BC, MB, NB, NFL, NS, ON, PEI, QC, SK

*Some curriculum expectations fall under different subjects

**This is not a comprehensive list of all of the French curriculum alignment across provinces

part 2:Instructional Activities

For each activity, you will find:

  • Required materials and classroom setup (including linked content)
  • Curriculum alignment
  • Activity duration
  • Digital literacy framework recommendations
  • Activity description, including the objective, “minds on” (warm-up), “action” (practice), and “consolidation” (closure and follow-up)
  • Tips, success criteria, and assessment, to help guide educators through the activity and connect to student assessment (if they choose)

Teachers are encouraged to choose activities that best align to their grade and instructional plan. The activities are meant to be adaptable to a teacher’s classroom context and constraints. Some activities may be used more than once to explore whether reflection and responses change over time.

Other Resources